Dear Jasper John:
Sometimes I wonder which planet you are living on!!
You actually believe people were freer and better off without “big government”?
My grandfather was “free” to die of gangrene after being forced to walk home after his leg was injured at work. No OSHA or other “gooferment” agencies were around to save him in your “good old days”. He died in 1939, one year before my birth, so I never got to know him. Corporations without the balancing power of government looking out for the common man are “free” to loot our economy and reduce the rest of us to beggars.
I recently came across some data that undermines the libertarian case that government is responsible for all the mass killings of recent centuries. In his recent book, “The Moral Landscape” (Free Press, 2010) Sam Harris quotes J. Diamond (New Yorker, April 21, 2008) as saying “It’s true, of course, that twentieth-century societies, having developed potent technologies for mass killing, have broken all historical records for violent deaths. But this is because they enjoy the advantage of having by far the largest populations of potential victims in human history; the actual percentage of the population that died violently was on the average higher in traditional pre-state societies than it was even in Poland during the Second World War or Cambodia under Pol Pot”. Harris also cites S. Pinker (New Republic, March 19, 2007) as stating that “If the wars of the twentieth century had killed the same proportion of the population that die in the wars of a typical tribal society there would have been two billion deaths, not 100 million”.
Again the “good old days” appear not to have been so good.
Sincerely Yours,
Donald M Stebbins
BS 1961
# – # – #
[JR: <1> Just planet earth. Didn't know there were other choices? lol. <2> Absolutely, "free-er". "Better off" implies that I can measure something called "better-ness". But, I take the bait. Yes! I'll just present one data point as "evidence". The Black Community. Prior to the "(pseudo) War on (some) Drugs" and the "War on Poverty", their lives were "better" (i.e., two parent households; low illegitimacy rate; working schools). After, their lives are "worse" (i.e., fatherless families; skyrocketing illegitimacy; dysfunctional schools) <3> I am truly sorry that you never got to know your grandfather. But, you can't seriously not recognize "regulatory capture"? OSH "regulates" safety; please don't make me laugh. Corporations are the creation of Gooferment and are used to loot the Sheeple. And, then the Gooferment, through its corporations, bribes the politicians, who reward the corporations and bureaucrats. It's incestuous. Yeah, we'd be much "better" off without such "help". Maybe if "business" didn't translate to Limited Liability Corporation, then someone could be held accountable for your grandfather. In a "libertarian" world, there's accountability. It goes with liberty. <4> So, you're arguing that Gooferments could have killed more to be in the same proportion? So we should have them because they could have killed more? I find that no very persuasive. I've always asserted that "Gooferment is the meme that kills people". Breaking it down further, the monopoly on the use of force to enforce its decisions is really the defective principle that it operates on. Maybe it's "the lion will lay down with the lamb" thinking, but that's why I adhere to the Zero Aggression Principle as a better meme. <5> As always, we will just have to agree to disagree agreeably.]
# # # # #