Tag Archives: abortion

ENDNOTE: The American Holocaust

http://thenewamerican.com/index.php/culture/family/2657-a-new-pro-life-documentary-blood-money

A New Pro-life Documentary: “Blood Money”   
Written by Rebecca Terrell   
Tuesday, 29 December 2009 18:45

*** begin quote ***

LifeSiteNews interviewed David K. Kyle, who wrote, directed, and co-produced the video. He explained the original title was “The American Holocaust,” but the production crew soon realized each interview they conducted pointed to one driving force behind the abortion industry: money. “As I traveled around the country last September doing all these interviews with various pro-life leaders and women who had had abortions, the money part just kept coming up.” Kyle lamented, “People are making millions upon millions of dollars off the murdering of innocent babies.”

In another interview with Catholic News Agency, Kyle explained that the central message of Blood Money is “abortion destroys lives” of unborn children as well as the women who have abortions and their families. He said the industry masks its monetary motives behind a ruse of helping women. He hopes the film will expose abortionists’ true incentives.

*** end quote ***

[JR: Even if you don't subscribe to the religious or moral reasons to oppose abortion, here's a message that might sway you: "follow the money"! Personally, I'm swayed by the loss of potential. Might "we" (as a species) aborted the person who would have cured cancer? How many people will suffer from these incalculable losses. It is "our" holocaust. When will it end?]

# # # # #

ENDNOTE: Jasper “Key West Lou” [MC????] thinks about abortion

http://www.keywestlou.com/2009/12/yesterday-was-not-typical-sunday.html

My Life in Key West
Monday, December 7, 2009
Jasper “Key West Lou” [MC????]

*** begin quote ***

And back to Saint Ambrose.

The Italians celebrate his day big time. Especially in Milan where he sat as Bishop.

Ambrose was born in Germany around 340 AD. Not an Italian. He died in Milan in 397 AD.

Ambrose was rich. Also, a big time political figure. This is before he became Bishop of Milan. This is before he was even a priest. In fact, it is even before he was baptized a Catholic.

The Church had its problems even back then. Powerful political figures were elevated to lofty Church positions.

The Pope wanted to make Ambrose Bishop of Milan. A big job! But he was not even a baptized Catholic. Ergo, he was not a memebr of the Catholic Church.

No problem. He was sprinkled with water and baptized. A week later the Pope officially made Ambrose Bishop of Milan!

I do not know why the Pope made Ambrose bishop. Whatever he may have expected from Ambrose did not materialize. Ambose took the job seriously. He was not just another political hack.

He gave all his lands and money to the poor. Shades of Saint Anthony. He commenced living the ascetic lifestyle.

Ambrose was not married before he became Bishop. Nor did he marry afterwards. Nor did he fool around.

Clergy were permitted to marry in those days under certain circumstances. Ambrose would have nothing of it.

Theodosius was Emperor at the time. He and Bishop Ambrose had a falling out over some issue. Bishop Ambrose forbad the Emperor from partaking of the Sacraments, including receiving Communion. It took seven months for Theodosius to see the light of day. When Theodosius corrected what Bishop Ambrose thought were his errant ways, the Bishop returned him to the Sacraments and the right to receive Communion.

I tell this story on this special day because it reflects what some of the Catholic Church hierarchy are attempting to do with certain elected officials over the abortion issue today.

Nothing changes.

The Catholic Church in one of its corrupt times still had members who believed and lived God’s life. As it is today.

I do not know who is right. This abortion issue is difficult. I believe in separation of church and state.

Is refusal to offer communion a violation of that separation? Is abortion a violation of God’s law?

Enjoy your day.

*** end quote ***

[JR: Abortion is certainly a difficult issue. And, I certainly don't hold myself out as a paragon of virtue or the ultimate moral authority. But certain principles are easily observable to this old injineer. (1) Abortion kills a potential human life. And is the start of the "slippery slope". (2) The Catholic Church has a right and duty to protect and preserve its "brand". Politicians, who voluntarily assert they are "catholic", have to observe the organization's dogmas. (3) As a Little L Libertarian, the "separation" is about the proper role of the State on the People. (4) As a "pro-lifer", I shouldn't be force to pay taxes for a morally abhorrent activity. (5) Finally, abortion is a personal issue. The State should have a very small role in protecting its future citizens. That is to make sure that abortions are as rare as possible. "Refusal" isn't a violation of the separation. Abortion as it is performed today most certainly is. Even if there is no God, it's a contra survival practice for a species. What if we have aborted the person who would cure cancer? Seems an appropriate Christmas reflection. Holy Innocents? Hope everyone had a happy holy day.]

# # # # #

JEMAIL: Toner, Mike (MC1972) chastizes the CIC

Dear John,

Your headline and the beginning of this story that you quote make it sound like the bill would offer free-for-all abortions, which is not the case. The jack-booted bishops and their allies came in and undid a carefully crafted compromise that did not violate the principles of the Hyde amendment but allowed people to pay for abortion coverage in an otherwise federally-funded plan. We live in a plural society. Many people do not believe that human life begins at conception. If you don’t believe in abortion, don’t have one – but let those who believe differently use their money as they wish.

I would have thought that this would be the libertarian position.

mike toner
BEE ‘72
Buffalo, NY

# – # – #

[JR: The Libertarian position would be that there should be NO forced taxation. Not like that is going to happen anytime soon. We can go into other Libertarian thoughts from there. But, let's start from there. As a taxpayer, it is abhorrent to be forced to pay for killing human beings. (I don't support the war or capital punishment either.) There is no way they can get away from the fact that this uses federal funds to pay for abortions. Otherwise why does it have ANY connection to the federally funded plan. They can squirm all they want but it does. And, I don't want to pay for it. Make the taxes voluntary, and see how much they collect! Us libertarians would like nothing better if EVERYONE could spend their money anyway they want. Sorry if I've disappointed you. It's not about beliefs; it's about force.]

Toner, Mike (MC1972)

# # # # #

ENDNOTE: Abortion in “health care” bill; what will you do about it?

http://www.lifenews.com/nat5561.html

Hundreds of Thousands of Pro-Life Students to Stand in Solidarity on Abortion
by Steven Ertelt
LifeNews.com Editor
October 12, 2009

*** begin quote ***

Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) — Hundreds of thousands of pro-life students are ready to stand in solidarity on abortion as the Pro-life Day of Silent Solidarity takes place a week from Tuesday. Last year, from over 4,700 campuses in 25 countries participated in the event and sponsors expect even more this year.

The day sees the students at middle and high schools and on college campuses wear pro-life t-shirts, sport red tape on their mouths to show how the unborn can’t speak up, and the distribution of fliers educating students and the public about abortion.

The event’s man sponsor, Stand True Ministries, tells LifeNews.com, one of several groups supporting the event, that at least 58 young women canceled appointments for abortions after the special day took place last year.

Bryan Kemper, the pro-life group’s president, says students are always excited every year to bring attention to the devastating travesty of abortion that is killing 4,000 unborn children and injuring women every day.

*** end quote ***

[JR: Interesting to see the children "speaking" up. Personally, I wonder if we have allowed the "abortion" of the gal who would cure cancer, the boy who'd break Jeter's record, or the next Gandhi who would bring us the "world peace" as often wished by beauty contest participants. The German people have never recovered from the shame of what was done to the Jews. Will we be regarded the same way? Will future generations look at this, askance, like the Salem Witch Trials? And, now with the supposedly "health care" bill, we're going to get abortions regardless of the consequences. Will this be the issue that splits the nation? Will this be the long awaited "revolt" of the silent majority. Will your taxes be paying for what you find morally abhorrent? What will you do about it?]

# # # # #

ENDNOTE: Franz Jägerstätter

http://www.lifenews.com/state4338.html

*** begin quote ***

“As a Roman Catholic institution, Belmont Abbey College is not able to and will not offer nor subsidize medical services that contradict the clear teaching of the Catholic Church,” Belmont Abbey president William Thierfelder said at the time. “There was no other course of action possible if we were to operate in fidelity to our mission and to our identity as a Catholic college.”

*** end quote ***

Catholics better get ready; Obama’s “health whatever” seeks to expand abortion “rights”. No conscience execption. No exceptions for Catholic institutions or people.

What is more objectionable is that we will be forced to pay for, through our taxes, something that we find morally objectionable in part for all. Will this be the straw that breaks our backs? Will Catholics finally stand up and “just say no”. Will we go to jail rather than submit to an immoral law. Remember Pastor Martin Niemîller! Remember Franz Jägerstätter! Remember the death camps!

Follow your conscience.

It’s going to be hard. May all my challenges be small; may all yours be too.

# # # # #

ENDNOTE: Conflict of interest in “medical care”

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2009/08/death_panels_in_oregon.html

August 11, 2009
‘Death Panels’ in Oregon?
Ethel C. Fenig

*** begin quote ***

But a 1998 study from Georgetown University’s Center for Clinical Bioethics found a strong link between cost-cutting pressures on physicians and their willingness to prescribe lethal drugs to patients — were it legal to do so.

The study warns that there must be “a sobering degree of caution in legalizing [assisted death] in a medical care environment that is characterized by increasing pressure on physicians to control the cost of care.”

Cancer drugs can cost anywhere from $3,000 to $6,000 a month. The cost of lethal medication, on the other hand, is about $35 to $50.

*** end quote ***

[JR: The Pope has warned us about the culture of death”. This supposed “healthcare reform”, “health insurance reform”, “health reform”, or whatever the media is trying to call it this week is a full scale reengineering of 20% of the economy. And, we are going to be stuck with the mess they leave behind. We are going to have to pay abortions and euthanasia. And, pay through the nose.]

http://www1.va.gov/pugetsound/docs/ylyc.pdf

[JR: Your Life - Your Choice" dealing with end of life decisions for Veterans from the caring and compassionate Veterans Administration. Vets joke that the VA is trying to kill them. We can expect the same from Obamacare!]

# # # # #

ENDNOTE: Gooferment “healthcare” is a call to action

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=105909

Time to go, Grandpa
Posted: August 04, 2009
Pat Buchanan

*** begin quote ***

To traditional Christians, God is the author of life, and innocent life, be it of the unborn or terminally ill, may not be taken. Heroic means to keep the dying alive are not necessary, but to advance a natural death by assisting a suicide or euthanasia is a violation of God’s commandment, Thou shalt not kill.

*** and ***

In Weimar, Germany, two professors published “The Permission to Destroy Life Unworthy of Life,” which advocated assisted suicide for the terminally ill and “empty shells of human beings.” Hitler’s Third Reich, marrying Social Darwinism to Aryan racial supremacy, carried the concepts to their logical if horrible conclusion.

*** end quote ***

[JR: It's hard to imagine government run "healthcare" with abortion and euthanasia. But, it will have it. And, we will be paying for it with our taxes. Personally, will the Church -- it's leadership and laity -- have the "stones" to on the day it is passed to do TWO things: (1) close ALL Catholic hospitals (i.e., shut them down and don't sell the facilities to the government; just leave them idle); AND (2) call on all Catholics and like minded souls to engage in civil disobedience. THe civil rights movement demonstrated how to do it. Do Catholics have the moral courage and intestinal fortitude to stand up for their beliefs?]

# # # # #

ENDNOTE: Pretending not to know when life begins

http://www.nationalpost.com/opinion/columnists/story.html?id=8b3d16b8-4e61-4fa3-a039-84a9cb7d7a34&p=1

Thoughts from an ex-fetus
George Jonas, National Post Published: Wednesday, June 03, 2009

*** begin quote ***

Living in an epoch that is selfish as well as matriarchal, our lifeboats are no longer marked “women and children first,” only “women first.” We invent euphemisms, such as “choice” for killing, and sophomoric dilemmas, such as pretending not to know when life begins, to ensure that nothing hinders Virginia’s quest for Santa Claus. No obstacle must interfere with her goal of self-fulfillment — least of all an issue (as it were) of her healthy sexual appetite.

*** end quote ***

Yup, we have a society that is killing its babies. I can’t envision a more contra-survival behavior. As a little L libertarian, I instinctively distrust the gooferment to have any role in what must be an intensely personal and troubling decision. That being said, we have to, as a society, deicide a better way. Clearly, the right to life begins when the fetus aka baby can survive on their own. We have mastered technology to push that point back further and further. Add to that the problem of who pays for what. And, you have a mess. We need to sort it out. FAST!

Principle #1: Life is sacred. Principle #2: Women have rights. Principle #3: The gooferment is the worst venue to decide this since it only has one size fits all solutions.

# # # # #

ENDNOTE: Principles don’t change with party

http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/guestvoices/2009/05/
notre_dame-obama_flap_about_faith_not_politics.html?hpid=opinionsbox1

Notre Dame’s Betrayal
By Patrick J. Reilly
president, Cardinal Newman Society

*** begin quote ***

In 2004 the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops issued a statement which reads, in part: “The Catholic community and Catholic institutions should not honor those who act in defiance of our fundamental moral principles. They should not be given awards, honors or platforms which would suggest support for their actions.”

*** and ***

Catholic principles don’t change with party affiliation, and all serious Catholics would be happy if abortion and other intrinsic evils were opposed by both Democrats and Republicans.

*** end quote ***

[JR: The "Catholic" brand has been damaged by the priestly pedophilia and pro-abortion politician scandal. I'm no saint, but I'm insulted by these two "bad examples". The leaders of the Church have to reassert control of their "brand". Otherwise, they fail. At the very least, they have to apply the whip to those who give public scandal. The Amish shun; Catholics, and those kindred spirits, have to do the same. Remember that on voting day!]

# # # # #

ENDNOTE: Notre Dame = CINO

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=93446

Is Notre Dame still Catholic?
Posted: March 31, 2009 1:00 am Eastern
Pat Buchanan

*** begin quote ***

But what Notre Dame is saying with this invitation is that Obama’s 100 percent support for policies and programs that bring death to more than a million unborn children every year is no disqualification to being honored by a university dedicated to Our Lady who carried to term the Son of God.

*** end quote ***

[JR: It certainly seems that Notre Dame is an embarrassment. I'd call it CINO -- Catholic In Name Only!]

# # # # #