REPORTING LIVE FROM THE FACEBOOK NEWS DESK
IN THE VIRTUAL JASPER JOTTINGS NEWSROOM …
Parriott, Don (MC1983) posted:
*** begin quote ***
As a trained scientist, and climate change “skeptic”, my main objection to the whole approach is that the liberals as Bible thumping morons who believe in fantasy. This is far from the truth, and there is legitimate scientific research that raises questions about climate change. Any real (read that objective) scientist would want to see all the evidence and make a decision based on all of the available data.
Many of the climate change advocates will not acknowledge the contrary evidence, and only choose the evidence that supports their personal opinion. This is not the scientific method.
Also, we “skeptics” are also skeptical because a vast majority of the research is done by government funded studies, but the government is only giving funding to studies that will support their preconceived notion of the truth.
*** end quote ***
So we should have the Separation of Science and State!
Not to put words in Jasper Parriott’s post, but …
The Federal Gooferment is immoral, ineffective, and inefficient.
One example of “inefficient” is the one sided “studies”.
It’s as if there would be no way to fund progress except without The Glorious Leader. (Oh, that’s the wrong Gooferment!) … … no way to fund progress without the Giant Federal State.
When with “We, The Sheeple” awake?
And how do we cut this “giant” down to size?
Laugh at it, ignore it, and secede from it.
# – # – # – # – #