COMMENT: Jablon, Ken (MC1962) disagrees on my conundrum

2017-Dec-03

John,

Regarding your “Positration: $28 baby saver”—I don’t believe it’s a conundrum because an aborted fetus is not a “baby.” I hope you and your family have a joyous Christmas and a happy and healthy 2018.

Ken Jablon ‘62

[JR: So can we agree to disagree agreeably? What if that “thing”, that was aborted, was the soul that was supposed to cure cancer, bring about world peace, or just the deciding vote for something important. I’m a pro-choice pro-life little L libertarian so I can believe, at conception, it’s a human being. That doesn’t mean I want the Gooferment legalizing / outlawing abortion, subsidizing abortion with my  stolen wealth in taxes, or propagandizing or proselytizing abortion around the globe. This should be an intensely personal decision between people with their medical professionals. Like the “death penalty”, it’s irreversible. I do think that many “pro-lifers” don’t recognize the needs after the baby is born.]  

# – # – # – # – #  2017-Dec-03 @ 14:17  

Advertisements

One response to “COMMENT: Jablon, Ken (MC1962) disagrees on my conundrum

  1. Frank MacGabhann

    And if that “soul to be aborted” was to be a serial killer, a second Hitler or peaderastic priest, what then?

    Frank Smith 1972

    Get Outlook for Android

    ________________________________

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s